Multan Sultans vs PCB: When constructive criticism becomes a crime
Asher Butt
The Pakistan Super League (PSL) — once celebrated as a symbol of progress and professionalism — finds itself at the center of yet another controversy. This time, the storm revolves around Multan Sultans owner Ali Tareen, whose outspoken views on improving the league’s structure and vision have triggered a legal response from the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB).
Last month, the PCB issued a legal notice to Tareen, demanding he retract his critical remarks and issue a public apology to the PSL management. The notice, as per the Sultans’ official statement, even threatens to terminate the franchise’s agreement and blacklist Tareen for life from owning a cricket team.
Now, the Sultans have fired back — not with aggression, but with clarity and conviction.
“Silencing honest feedback is not how great leagues are built,” reads the Sultans’ statement — a line that perfectly sums up the growing tension between vision and control in Pakistan cricket.
Ali Tareen’s track record speaks volumes. Since taking over Multan Sultans, he has invested billions of rupees, personally endured losses exceeding PKR 7 billion, and more importantly, created genuine opportunities for young cricketers through development programs and academies across the country.
His criticism of the PSL wasn’t destructive — it was directional. He called for higher standards, better management, and a more transparent operational model. Yet, instead of embracing the feedback, the system chose to silence it.
This episode reveals a worrying mindset — where questioning authority is treated as defiance, not dialogue. If the PSL truly aspires to compete with the world’s best leagues, it must welcome constructive criticism, not punish those who care enough to demand better.
Ali Tareen’s commitment remains clear: he isn’t fighting against the PSL — he’s fighting for it. And until that distinction is recognized by those in charge, Pakistan cricket risks losing not just investors, but visionaries.

No comments:
Post a Comment